The KillerDAC Audio forum

General HIFI => Cables => Topic started by: onthebeach on January 23, 2014, 03:39:08 PM

Title: Essence gZero
Post by: onthebeach on January 23, 2014, 03:39:08 PM
I've recently introduced a set of speaker cables to my system. They are the new Essence gZero 50s from Keith Eichmann.

They are certainly not cheap and I could have had a decent holiday with the amount I laid out for them but the results have been absolutely stunning. I have not had such high end (price) cables previously to compare these with but any cables I have had (many others far cheaper) fall a long long way short of the mark that these cables have made. They have replaced my Van den hul skyline Hybrids.

They have opened up my system in a way I did not think was possible with any cables whether it be IC's, digital or SC's. I've had reasonable improvements and refinements over the years by experimenting with different cables bought and borrowed but no result like this. If you get a chance to audition a pair please do. Or then again if you don't want to part with the folding stuff then don't go anywhere near an audition.

I have a decent pair of IC's between pre and power amp as well as between Kdac and pre but I'm now very keen to road test some gZero ICs to hear how they compare. Its a slippery slope....but better value than a holiday to Bali ;D

Nathan

Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: stevenvalve on January 23, 2014, 03:57:18 PM
I have heard they are very good, but expensive. You should send them to me, so you are not reminded about the price.
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: onthebeach on January 23, 2014, 04:03:51 PM
Yes they are expensive and convincing my better half that we could put them on the home loan took some weeks of me being the perfect man but to my delight I'm very happy with the result...of the cables.

I guess at that level the cables are components in themselves. Many expensive components sound like sh!te as do many expensive cables.

modified slightly so as not to offend
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: vitavoxdude on January 24, 2014, 02:23:58 PM
Could you send us a link to the advertising blurb and some images please? ;D ;D
V ;)
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: hedalfa on January 24, 2014, 05:41:37 PM
Could you send us a link to the advertising blurb and some images please? ;D ;D
V ;)

I second that, as the info will be interesting... ;D
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: onthebeach on January 24, 2014, 09:49:35 PM
I haven't seen any advertising or written info. No blurbs yet. I guess there will be down the track.
I spoke with Rawl99 a few times about these cables over the last couple of months. He has been road testing them and had nice things to say. I trust his ears so I took a punt.
I'll see if I can get a pic up when I get a chance.
(https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/73045398/Gz50a.JPG)

As you can see they are nothing fancy to look at. They start looking much better once you hear them though.
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: kajak12 on February 04, 2014, 11:09:43 PM
rawl99 will send me some later in the year
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: onthebeach on February 06, 2014, 03:46:03 PM
Nice one. I'm hoping to get a pair of the ICs to demo against my Revelation audio labs that I use atm later on in the year as well. Apparantly according to Rawl they are pretty special and if my SCs are any indication I'm assuming they are just that .
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: rawl99 on February 12, 2014, 07:46:17 PM
Yes they are stupidly expensive and convincing my better half that we could put them on the home loan took some weeks of me being the perfect man but to my delight I'm very happy with the result...of the cables.

I guess at that level the cables are components in themselves. Many expensive components sound like sh!te as do many expensive cables.

Hey Nathan,

Glad I haven't caused a divorce.
Firstly, thank you for trusting my suggestion re trying these cables.  I have been really impressed with what they do and have compared them with a number of cables at varying price points.
You really do have me a little puzzled I have to admit in one respect.
I picked this quote of yours to type this on because I am trying to work out why you consider these cables to be "Stupid Expensive".
If I had considered them to be stupid expensive there is no way that I would have suggested them to you, let alone suggest them to anybody else, such as Mario and his band of 'cohorts' (Hi guys!!). :P

If I was looking at 'Stupid Expensive' I would have gone straight to Transparent Audio (excellent cables by the way.  Have had a reasonable amount of exposure to the higher-end range and matched correctly!! with the system they are very good...... but...)

Mid Spec:
Musicwave Ultra: FROM US$3045
Reference SC: FROM US$6625
Higher Spec:
Reference XL: FROM US$13160
Reference MM: FROM $US$20995
Opus MM SC: FROM US$34735

Yours $3000 for a 4m set
normally the FROM in the above is 3m std length plus pro-rata for additional length.

And given my choice between yours and the Reference SC or Reference XL, from previous listening experience I would take the ones you have got (Given that I had them in my system and ran them in for you I think I got a pretty good idea what they sound like)

So I have to ask the question:  Where else could you have spent $3000 and achieved the degree of improvement that the speaker cables gave you????
Because my experience is that significant expenditure in other areas gave me, as you described, incremental improvements but once I put these cables in the change was quite insane, particularly in terms of the stuff that really matters to me:
Flow and cohesiveness of the music,
Integration across the range,
Lack of hardness and etch,
Superb resolution and inner detail--- not that brittle etched hardness that some people view as detail
Timbral beauty and harmonic resolution
AND......................ENGAGEMENT!!!!!!!!!!

The last word is what these cables do for me like nothing I have yet heard... except perhaps for 1 system at approx $1.2Mill... but that was running a magic TT at the front end.
All I have is a 'Lowly' 'Home-made' Killer Dac

So I guess the best way I can describe my experience with these cables is that they sound like a Killer Dac rather than like a ESS Sabre.

My Lad and i did a little comparison last week between a highly regarded cable that was recommended to me by a certain bloke from Melbourne which as an IC cost approx A$1200 for a 1m pair.
We listened to Holst, The Planets and then changed to the KLEI 40 series interconnects that I have.
We changed and gave the 40s about 5 minutes of settling time and fired it up again.  Lad looked at me and said 'you set the volume much higher' to which I replied 'No, it is indeed the same'.

Which it was.  But the sense of Life and dynamics with the 40 ICs was SO MUCH greater than the other cables that it sounded like the volume had been turned up a couple of notches.  Not in a bad way louder, but in that I want to turn that up louder way, but it was so much more dynamic it was crazy.
Tuba, bass trombone had a nice bite and rasp like the real thing.

Are they coming out.  No chance.
Could I go back?  No chance.

So as Nathan said in an earlier post.  If you are looking to buy a set of cables then audition these.
If you are tyre-kicking with no intention of spending money; then for Pete's sake do not audition these because you will not want to give them back.

So, from my POV, the 3 most cost-effective improvements I have made in my system are (Not in order of importance)
1.  Getting a Killer DAC
2. A set of absolutely magificent rare-as-rocking-horse-doodoo ECC32 valves for my power amp (Thanks Steve)... and the black plate KT88s...
3. KLEI speaker cables and interconnects like yours Nathan

Cheers

Rawl

Oh, PS that just popped into my head:

We compared the interconnects KLEI Model: 40 @ $2500) with some interconnects circa 3 times that price on a very expensive system.
Interesting result.  Of 4 people present (me being one of them), 3 of the 4 preferred the KLEI 40 for the reasons I described in the 'stuff that matters to me' part above--- yes I was one of the 3!

But here was the interesting part.  The new Harmony connectors that KL uses on these cables take a solid hour to settle and improve more in microdetail and nuance as hours go by.
They sound absolutely terriffic to start but just continue to get better over a period of a few days.
So, if the 40s had had a longer settling period (ie more than 5 minutes) like the 3x cost cables already connected in the system, what may the outcome of the comparison been?  4 out of 4??



Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: ozmillsy on February 13, 2014, 10:55:29 AM
Whoa,,,,, good post.

What people consider 'stupid money' is relative.
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: hedalfa on February 13, 2014, 11:45:14 AM
I think Nathan is quite right to use the term 'Stupid Expensive' because whats expensive or not doesn’t have a fixed frame of reference. For many people what they would see as so much money on cables is crazy. Yet there is a lot of different ways that things can be crazy. I find much more crazy the expense a life time of buying and selling and not really getting a great system in the end and having spent a considerable sum on the turn-over of gear.  Or the cost of always penny pinching and buying all kinds of things to help along what is basically C or worse grade gear in the first place. For me whats crazy expensive is something that costs a lot but delivers little or nothing.  Certainly I don’t think Nathan wrote that.

I am looking forward to hearing these cable for my-self. From reports it seems these offer a great return on investment and are not a crazy purchase in that sense.

In Nathans case he could have got his axiom 80 running in new cabinets and maybe got Steve to come down and help tune them.  Theres no way the VAFs will get near the axiom 80. Though the times not right for Nathan and not everyone who has axiom 80 has really got them to sing. Though the new cables allow Nathan to really enjoy his system and there be waiting if he want to run axiom 80 one day.  I cant think of much else he can do for 3,000. He could try to get a sweet valve single ended amp, though that wont suit the vafs. 

Nathan has confirmed his great satisfaction with these cable, on the face of it you have really helped him out by recommending these cables, seems hes real happy. That’s got to be a good outcome because as we know its far from a given thing that by changing something in a system that we make it better.
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: zenelectro on February 13, 2014, 01:46:17 PM
Nelson Pass has a pretty funny anecdote in his amplifier user manuals which goes something like:
"good cables are important but try not to spend more on your cables than you did on the amp!" 

I had a good chuckle on that one,  :)

Seriously though, I think Nathans comment of 'stupid expensive' is more an indication of his healthy sense of values WRT fitting the cost of hi fi into your life whilst maintaining
a sense of balance with family and other commitments.

It's not really the place to talk nuts and bolts $ comparisons, however the entire clock upgrade was a small fraction of that figure.

The whole spirit of this website originally encouraged exchange of ideas and information for hi end enthusiasts to get great sound without spending huge money.

I have clear memories of Steven and others coming from the world of stratospheric cable prices, Mpingo room tuning devices etc etc. and shifting to an entirely refreshing approach of
do-it-yourself, get better results for less money whilst being technically guided by a few of us propeller heads ! We all learned and and had a lot of fun along the way.

You can certainly grab those cables back and I'm sure he will miss them but this is the age old hi end theme - the same can be said for the clock and the .... fill in the dots.

Craig - why don't you see if you can come up with a speaker cable that has similar performance to these for reasonable cost.
IME all these esoteric cables are made from pretty readily available materials but the accumulated margins on them are not insignificant from the time they walk
out Eichmanns door and in to to the customers. I think this is entirely possible and I'm pretty confident you could do it. 

That is more in line with the spirit of this website and it's contributors!


Z
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: vitavoxdude on February 13, 2014, 02:50:41 PM
Right on the money Zen  ;D and closely aligns with my view on the 'shirt salesman' pricing bling attracts.  This forum is not about how much disposable income you have but about getting quality results with the help of others knowledge and experiences.  SNA is the place for such bling.

I used to retail as a manufacturer interconnects and speaker cables and can confirm most are using off the shelf parts with a posh jacket around them.  Mark ups can be astonishing! VDH cables are an exception WRT parts.
V ;)
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: hedalfa on February 13, 2014, 07:04:02 PM
Right on the money Zen  ;D and closely aligns with my view on the 'shirt salesman' pricing bling attracts.  This forum is not about how much disposable income you have but about getting quality results with the help of others knowledge and experiences.  SNA is the place for such bling.

I used to retail as a manufacturer interconnects and speaker cables and can confirm most are using off the shelf parts with a posh jacket around them.  Mark ups can be astonishing! VDH cables are an exception WRT parts.
V ;)

Certainly right there some cables that look real good but there made of junk, poor connectors, wire from who knows where. Same with connectors wbt look alikes aren't wbts doesn't matter how shinny they are.
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: vitavoxdude on February 13, 2014, 07:24:32 PM
 ;D The other thing that comes to mind is the law of diminishing returns, once you have reached the ~ 600 $ per interconnect and slightly more for speaker cables your VFM goes South big time.

With really good kit the cables sometimes do not make a huge difference IMV and as already mentioned when the cost is higher than the kit its connecting then its time to shout wolf.  :(   :-X
V
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: ozmillsy on February 13, 2014, 08:20:26 PM
Rawl's post seems to differ greatly.

Given the massive wraps,  these $3k cables are challenging our preconceptions.

Seems a bit ignorant to be dismissing the 1st hand views being presented, without listening for ourselves.
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: vitavoxdude on February 13, 2014, 08:39:39 PM
Fair enough but 3K AUD for a set of speaker cables..............certainly better than the others mentioned at thier astronomic prices. How would I spend the money to improve the system more, easy, get a R2R player with some decent tapes, they will urinate all over the incremental differences in expenditure on speaker cables past 500 dollars IMV.
V
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: ozmillsy on February 13, 2014, 09:31:19 PM
:)  now you're just pressing my buttons bringing r2r into it. :D

There is soo much goodness to be had from tape.

Cant wait until someone (local) develops a tube output stage with the eq that lets us tap direct of the heads.   We've got to go there,,,,,,,
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: rawl99 on February 13, 2014, 10:11:17 PM
Nelson Pass has a pretty funny anecdote in his amplifier user manuals which goes something like:
"good cables are important but try not to spend more on your cables than you did on the amp!" 

I had a good chuckle on that one,  :)

Seriously though, I think Nathans comment of 'stupid expensive' is more an indication of his healthy sense of values WRT fitting the cost of hi fi into your life whilst maintaining
a sense of balance with family and other commitments.

It's not really the place to talk nuts and bolts $ comparisons, however the entire clock upgrade was a small fraction of that figure.

The whole spirit of this website originally encouraged exchange of ideas and information for hi end enthusiasts to get great sound without spending huge money.

I have clear memories of Steven and others coming from the world of stratospheric cable prices, Mpingo room tuning devices etc etc. and shifting to an entirely refreshing approach of
do-it-yourself, get better results for less money whilst being technically guided by a few of us propeller heads ! We all learned and and had a lot of fun along the way.

You can certainly grab those cables back and I'm sure he will miss them but this is the age old hi end theme - the same can be said for the clock and the .... fill in the dots.

Craig - why don't you see if you can come up with a speaker cable that has similar performance to these for reasonable cost.
IME all these esoteric cables are made from pretty readily available materials but the accumulated margins on them are not insignificant from the time they walk
out Eichmanns door and in to to the customers. I think this is entirely possible and I'm pretty confident you could do it. 

That is more in line with the spirit of this website and it's contributors!


Z


Tez,

Ballpark of a third of that figure for the clock fitted plus the upgrades would not be my definition of a 'small fraction of that figure'. 
Given what a Marantz or Wadia player is worth, spending as much to upgrade it as the base unit is worth would be just as questionable.
HOWEVER, when the upgrades give the degree of improvement out of the player that they do then that makes the upgrade a no-brainer imo. 
So my view is that the cost is relative in terms of the improvement that is offered... and not only in relation to the cost of the other bits that it may be used in conjunction with.
As was said, small $ components do not necessarily perform poorly and neither do big $ components necessarily perform superbly.
But if you just look at it from a $ relativity to the cost of the base unit then the same price as the unit is worth to upgrade it is just as 'stupid expensive'.

I have spent a Sh---load of hours developing cables and compared these cables in their very early development approx a year ago and mine were better.
They now eat mine and spit them out so I have far more useful stuff to do than waste my time trying to create something as good or better.  For the cost of the amount of time I would have to dedicate to creating something as good I could buy 10 sets of these and still be ahead.
I have watched a year of development go into these cables by Keith.
Same reason you don't sell your Zen clocks for a $100 like a Trichord.  LOTS!! of development time.

Each to his own.

Unfortunately I do not have the time in my life like Steve for example has had to developing a superb system.
If you were to cost in his time to any degree into what he has achieved it would scare most people half-to-death.

If people consider the cables to be 'stupid expensive' so be it.

As I said, for me, for what they offered me, I considered them to be exceptionally good value.

If you disagree, so be it

Craig
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: rawl99 on February 13, 2014, 10:16:15 PM
Fair enough but 3K AUD for a set of speaker cables..............certainly better than the others mentioned at thier astronomic prices. How would I spend the money to improve the system more, easy, get a R2R player with some decent tapes, they will urinate all over the incremental differences in expenditure on speaker cables past 500 dollars IMV.
V

V,

I agree wholeheartedly which is why I have an MTR12.

But a dozen or two tapes with limited choice of genre soes not my boat rock.
It has its place in my overall system approach but given the diversity of CD music I have gone to some effort to optimise my CD playback.
Why would one bother buying/building/tuning a KDac if we all adopted your viewpoint.

Should all get R2R and listen to 10 tapes for the rest of our lives ;D

Craig

Oh yeah, just as a small added bonus my R2R ALSO sounds a lot better with the new cables as well as CD and vinyl.

Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: vitavoxdude on February 13, 2014, 11:38:08 PM
Yes building one's collection of tapes need's dedication and a deep wallet.  I was merely commenting on  how I'd spend 3 K to improve a system.  I think I'd also rather have a top flight tuner and aerial as this brings into one's life a huge amount of music which you'd probably not get exposed to normally.  Horses for courses. ;D

Incremental difference do exist between various manufacturers of cables as we all informed types know but once you breach the figures I mentioned the effects / improvements become very system dependent IMV.  I suppose if you are cashed up then fair enough, blow the money and more importantly, support local manufactures!  ;D

Yeah know what you mean, your new cables will make all source components sound better, no argument there.  It's just my view that there are other things to get right first.  Labouring the point a bit:


Great music is the KEY as far as I am concerned as even low price kit can sound good fed the right diet of music.

Just my tuppenth worth!  :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
V[/list]
Title: Re: Essence gZero
Post by: zenelectro on February 14, 2014, 03:50:59 AM
Yes building one's collection of tapes need's dedication and a deep wallet.  I was merely commenting on  how I'd spend 3 K to improve a system.  I think I'd also rather have a top flight tuner and aerial as this brings into one's life a huge amount of music which you'd probably not get exposed to normally.  Horses for courses. ;D

Incremental difference do exist between various manufacturers of cables as we all informed types know but once you breach the figures I mentioned the effects / improvements become very system dependent IMV.  I suppose if you are cashed up then fair enough, blow the money and more importantly, support local manufactures!  ;D

Yeah know what you mean, your new cables will make all source components sound better, no argument there.  It's just my view that there are other things to get right first.  Labouring the point a bit:

    • source including great music
    • speakers
    • amp
    • Interconnects
    • Speaker cable
    • equipment supports
    • Mains feed

    Great music is the KEY as far as I am concerned as even low price kit can sound good fed the right diet of music.

    Just my tuppenth worth!  :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
    V[/list]

    I've already stirred up the honey bees around here - have to get the smoker out!  :)

    However, this is pretty close to how I see it and IMO an even handed effective approach.

    PS Double emphasis on that first one - great music.   ;)


    Z


     
    Title: Re: Essence gZero
    Post by: springcreek on February 14, 2014, 08:59:41 AM
    I hope we get to hear these cables at the Canberra GTG in May  8)

    Really looking forward to it...I may have to sell a kidner to get some  :'(
    Title: Re: Essence gZero
    Post by: ozmillsy on February 14, 2014, 01:05:28 PM
    I hope we get to hear these cables at the Canberra GTG in May  8)
    Yeah, that would be great, if it could be organised.

    Everything is system dependant,  theres so many ways to realise improvements.

    IMV, the main ingrediant to sonic bliss, is being open to the options (accompanied by hard work and patience).

    I agree with taking a balanced approach.    We're all on a journey.
    Title: Re: Essence gZero
    Post by: zenelectro on February 14, 2014, 01:45:46 PM
    If people consider the cables to be 'stupid expensive' so be it.

    As I said, for me, for what they offered me, I considered them to be exceptionally good value.

    If you disagree, so be it

    Craig

    Craig,


    No worries, we'll leave it there, better all round for everyone.  ;)

    I think it will be a good excuse for a gtg / listening sesh / few beers :)

    Nathan,

    I hope I haven't made you feel uncomfortable or out of place here - sincerest apologies if I have.

    Over the few phone conversations I have had with yourself and your wife I can tell you guys are great people so:

    as Kajak says - enjoy the journey!

    Tez
    Title: Re: Essence gZero
    Post by: rawl99 on February 14, 2014, 03:47:05 PM
    ;D The other thing that comes to mind is the law of diminishing returns, once you have reached the ~ 600 $ per interconnect and slightly more for speaker cables your VFM goes South big time.

    With really good kit the cables sometimes do not make a huge difference IMV and as already mentioned when the cost is higher than the kit its connecting then its time to shout wolf.  :(   :-X
    V

    V

    the law of diminishing returns applies EVERYWHERE.
    So why do people spend $2000 for a single tube for example?
    Why spent $5-$10k for a cart
    Why spend 15k for a set of speakers cause the drivers are only likely worth a few hundred bucks.
    Why spend 10k for an amp that has no more than a $1000 in parts contained within it?  So it cant be much better than an amp worth 5k can it??
    Were does the law of diminishing returns set in wrt:
    Transport,
    DAC,Preamp,
    AMP
    Speakers
    Room treatments and acoustics
    etc etc etc

    ie How does one define when is good enough, good enough???

    And it is really interesting that your experiences and mine differ like black and white.
    I have consistently found that the better the 'kit' the more difference the cables make because the greater the potential of the 'kit' to produce brilliance
    Such is life.

    And:
    "as already mentioned when the cost is higher than the kit its connecting then its time to shout wolf"
    True words perhaps but in Nathans case we are talking amplification circa $15k and speakers circa $12ik sh ono, plus the rest of the front end is up to a similar standard
    \So let me do my math
    Speaker cables $3k
    Amp+Speakers say $25k

    Close enough to 10%

    and if you wanna add interconnects for example then add the cost of the front end on before doing the maths again

    This information is shared with Nathans Ok to do so as I felt it appropriate to put this all in some sensible perspective.

    So what % do you reckon is on the right side of the diminishing returns law wrt cable cost in a system????

    And how much should I realistically spend on each of the other components to get a sound quality that I will be happy with????????????


    If Nathan had a couple of thousand buck Harvey Norman HiFi then i would concur with your point of view.  But he deosn't.

    Like a lot of us he has made sacrifices in other areas to save the $ to get to where he wanted to over a period of quite some years I am sure.
    And I am sure, like a lot of us, he also looks some days at what he has invested into audio, shakes his head and walks out the room. :o :o :o :o :o
    Title: Re: Essence gZero
    Post by: rawl99 on February 14, 2014, 03:48:43 PM
    If people consider the cables to be 'stupid expensive' so be it.

    As I said, for me, for what they offered me, I considered them to be exceptionally good value.

    If you disagree, so be it

    Craig

    Craig,


    No worries, we'll leave it there, better all round for everyone.  ;)

    I think it will be a good excuse for a gtg / listening sesh / few beers :)

    Nathan,

    I hope I haven't made you feel uncomfortable or out of place here - sincerest apologies if I have.

    Over the few phone conversations I have had with yourself and your wife I can tell you guys are great people so:

    as Kajak says - enjoy the journey!

    Tez

    Good Plan my Friend.

    C
    Title: Re: Essence gZero
    Post by: rawl99 on February 14, 2014, 03:52:35 PM
    Yes building one's collection of tapes need's dedication and a deep wallet.  I was merely commenting on  how I'd spend 3 K to improve a system.  I think I'd also rather have a top flight tuner and aerial as this brings into one's life a huge amount of music which you'd probably not get exposed to normally.  Horses for courses. ;D

    Incremental difference do exist between various manufacturers of cables as we all informed types know but once you breach the figures I mentioned the effects / improvements become very system dependent IMV.  I suppose if you are cashed up then fair enough, blow the money and more importantly, support local manufactures!  ;D

    Yeah know what you mean, your new cables will make all source components sound better, no argument there.  It's just my view that there are other things to get right first.  Labouring the point a bit:

      • source including great music
      • speakers
      • amp
      • Interconnects
      • Speaker cable
      • equipment supports
      • Mains feed

      Great music is the KEY as far as I am concerned as even low price kit can sound good fed the right diet of music.

      Just my tuppenth worth!  :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
      V[/list]

      I've already stirred up the honey bees around here - have to get the smoker out!  :)

      However, this is pretty close to how I see it and IMO an even handed effective approach.

      PS Double emphasis on that first one - great music.   ;)


      Z


       


      T,

      and I think the saddest part is there seems to be less and less of superbly put together new music form a production quality pov.

      There are some great new artists putting together some really creative stuff so if you can prod some of your sound-mates to produce it very nicely we may be able to get a direct-to-market thing going with some of the local talent rather than a lot of the very poorly put together commercial suff.

      C
      Title: Re: Essence gZero
      Post by: rawl99 on February 14, 2014, 04:10:59 PM
      Yes building one's collection of tapes need's dedication and a deep wallet.  I was merely commenting on  how I'd spend 3 K to improve a system.  I think I'd also rather have a top flight tuner and aerial as this brings into one's life a huge amount of music which you'd probably not get exposed to normally.  Horses for courses. ;D

      Incremental difference do exist between various manufacturers of cables as we all informed types know but once you breach the figures I mentioned the effects / improvements become very system dependent IMV.  I suppose if you are cashed up then fair enough, blow the money and more importantly, support local manufactures!  ;D

      Yeah know what you mean, your new cables will make all source components sound better, no argument there.  It's just my view that there are other things to get right first.  Labouring the point a bit:

        • source including great music
        • speakers
        • amp
        • Interconnects
        • Speaker cable
        • equipment supports
        • Mains feed

        Great music is the KEY as far as I am concerned as even low price kit can sound good fed the right diet of music.

        Just my tuppenth worth!  :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
        V[/list]

        V.

        I will happily give you more than Tuppence for your viewpoints here Sir.
        Nail on Head.
        Without great music no system,  no matter how cheap, or how expensive or how well put together will sound great.  That I agree is the most important take-home fact.

        The order of the things in your list I find varies depending upon the type of component.
        eg Mains feed:   with heavily regulated gear makes little difference, with virtually unregulated gear it makes a lot of difference.
        Speakers... agree fully.
        Equipment support is a funny one and I don't actually agree with your position on the list.  I have taken some very average sounding systems (at various system price points) and by proper isolation transformed them into really nice sounding set-ups.
        'Proper' seems to vary by device as one size ime does not in any way fit all.
        I can change the material of the isolation platform under my DAC for example and completely transform the resultant sound from beautiful, resolved and engaging, to quite cool and lean and lacking in warmth and engagement.  Much greater than the change from a cable.

        But without a great IC cable the sense of the change is limited.
        Speaeker cable and IC very similar effect pretty much as you write.

        All well-designed amps are indistinguishable!! Didn't you know?  So you can delete that from your list or at list put it at the bottom in its rightful position.


        And to finish:
        "Incremental difference do exist between various manufacturers of cables as we all informed types know but once you breach the figures I mentioned the effects / improvements become very system dependent IMV"

        And yet Nathans comments mirrored my experiences that he experienced a profound difference with the cables this time as opposed to the incremental differences he had heard in the past.

        So are you saying that there is no such thing as a well-designed cable but merely one that happens to suit 'your' system as it stands at any point in time??????
        So why not go and buy a collection of $50 cables and use them to tune whatever components one happens to have together at any given point in time??

        Curious as to your views good Sir

        C
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: stevenvalve on February 14, 2014, 04:16:37 PM
        What if you had a preamp and a power amp in one (integrated). Then had the exactly same thing, but two separated components, (pre and power) so the only real difference was the interconnects that joins them together. Then you used many different types of interconnect cables with the separates, and with some interconnects the sound was better, sometimes much better than with the integrated.  What is that telling you....................  
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: gamve on February 14, 2014, 04:41:16 PM
        What if you had a preamp and a power amp in one (integrated). Then had the exactly same thing, but two separated components, (pre and power) so the only real difference was the interconnects that joins them together. Then you used many different types of interconnect cables with the separates, and with some interconnects the sound was better, sometimes much better than with the integrated.  What is that telling you....................  

        Your using the wrong wire in the integrated.. Tee Hee. Sorry Steve just being a smartarse
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: ozmillsy on February 14, 2014, 05:01:50 PM
        They cant be the same,  they are by design,  different.

        Integrated's have 1 power supply.   Seperates have seperate power supplies.  This changes the circuit design,  which changes everything.

        But I am out of my depth on this point, so will merely concur that wire can make a dramatic difference.
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: gamve on February 14, 2014, 07:46:53 PM
        They cant be the same,  they are by design,  different.

        Integrated's have 1 power supply.   Seperates have seperate power supplies.  This changes the circuit design,  which changes everything.

        But I am out of my depth on this point, so will merely concur that wire can make a dramatic difference.

        Yes that's a point Andrew but there were good quality integrateds that had discrete power supplies for the different sections. It is not that
        unusual. No argument that all connections, everything from materials metallurgy, type of contact point, type of insulation, size etc all play a part.
        Just sometimes the simplest connection as per a piece of wire with two solder joints is hard to make better.
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: stevenvalve on February 14, 2014, 09:50:03 PM
        I am saying, do interconnects, speaker cables, add something, sometimes nice, and oviously sometimes not, does that mean they are adding something. Is a great expensive speaker cable (like Nathans) letting the truth through, or is it actually adding a nice quality that may not be there, if the amps where built into the speakers (No speaker cables)  
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: zenelectro on February 14, 2014, 10:06:36 PM
        I am saying, do interconnects, speaker cables, add something, sometimes nice, and oviously sometimes not, does that mean they are adding something. Is a great expensive speaker cable (like Nathans) letting the truth through, or is it actually adding a nice quality that may not be there, if the amps where built into the speakers (No speaker cables)  

        Bingo - Post of the week! 

        Go and claim your prize :)

        Z

        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: ozmillsy on February 15, 2014, 07:37:38 AM
        Always challenging us to think differently, onya Mate. But Steven, surely it could be 'either'.

         In this example, given Rawls description, it appears to be letting more through.  If capacitance is a factor, probably letting through.  

        But either way, does it matter? As long as we acknowledge that cables (all types) can and do change the sound, and quite often this can be dramatic (not just an incremental change).

        I guess if it's adding something to the mix,  you could cook up a similar kaleidoscope recipe, using different (cheaper) items.    Hard work though.
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: zenelectro on February 15, 2014, 01:08:38 PM
        Always challenging us to think differently, onya Mate. But Steven, surely it could be 'either'.

         In this example, given Rawls description, it appears to be letting more through.  If capacitance is a factor, probably letting through.  

        But either way, does it matter? As long as we acknowledge that cables (all types) can and do change the sound, and quite often this can be dramatic (not just an incremental change).

        I guess if it's adding something to the mix,  you could cook up a similar kaleidoscope recipe, using different (cheaper) items.    Hard work though.

        WRT cooking - you can chase your tail a bit. IMV go far cables that are as much an 'open window' as you can - there are a few gotchas.

        I gave the post of the week to SV because I think he hit one of the biggest truths of hi end.

        It's always one of the very first things I ask myself when listening to something: Am I hearing what is actually there or am I hearing the result of something being added, if so what is it

        IME, as a generalization, massive subjective single improvements are often additive. Incremental improvements usually subtractive or - hearing more what's there. There are always exceptions.

        Also as a generalization if the sound appears generally louder it's nearly always additive and the same applies if it moves forward 'out in to the room' as opposed to back.  

        It's a very deep subject and the only way to really know is do the recordings yourself but IMV you need some of both ie; great transparency but also some sweetness added.

        Z
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: stevenvalve on February 15, 2014, 03:59:19 PM
        Always challenging us to think differently, onya Mate. But Steven, surely it could be 'either'.

         In this example, given Rawls description, it appears to be letting more through.  If capacitance is a factor, probably letting through.  

        But either way, does it matter? As long as we acknowledge that cables (all types) can and do change the sound, and quite often this can be dramatic (not just an incremental change).

        I guess if it's adding something to the mix,  you could cook up a similar kaleidoscope recipe, using different (cheaper) items.    Hard work though.
        Yes all components change the sound, audio cables are just another tool in tuning a system.
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: onthebeach on February 15, 2014, 03:59:36 PM
        My phrase of 'stupidly expensive' was a throw away line and one in hindsight with the connotations it suggests, I probably would not have used (of these SCs being too expensive or not a 'good value for money' addition to my system). I humbly apologise for any offence caused along the way. If I had spent as much R&D, time & energy on a product as good as this and an early adopter used that phrase I could possible take offence.

        I have never contemplated spending anything near that sort of money on cables until very recently so my head is partially still in the camp of any cable over say 1K being 'stupidly expensive'. Its only really over the past couple of years that I have learnt from experience that cables can make a difference in the SQ. Sometimes for the worse and sometimes for the better and sometimes just different. Previously neither my ears nor my system were up to hearing or showing these differences.

        A better way to phrase it would have been 'Yes Steven, any cable of this price is indeed expensive but these SCs relatively speaking with consideration of the cost of the rest of my system and the results they have bought to the table are for me, in my system an investment that I am really really happy with'.

        Most around here and including myself up until very recently probably feel this sort of money is crazy (stupid) for cables. Its common for people on hifi forums to justify their big new purchase so I don't want to rave too much about how happy I am with them and how happy I am with the 'bang for the buck' they have given me. I'll leave that to those with far more experience comparing systems and cables. But I guess with the 'stupid expensive' phrase I was trying to get across that like most around here I have always thought spending so much on cables is risky at best. My budget for the year on component purchases is pretty much gone on these cables so its not as if I have loads of cash to throw away on expensive cables. Again 'stupidly expensive' being a recently relative term was in my head when I wrote that.

        Rawl is correct that in consideration of the ratio of the RRP of amp and speakers the cost of the SCs is not so bad. Don't get me wrong, I wish I could have spent way way less than that and still get SCs that do for my system what these cables of KL's have done. But it hasn't happened. My system was at the stage where I really felt like a decent pair of SCs may be a good move for me. I was happy with the Van den Hul Skyline Hybrids I was using which were slightly better than the ETI Quinessence 1000s I was using before them. I spoke to Rawl about this well over 12 months back and at that time I would have envisaged a very decent set of SCs to have set me back around the $800 - $1000 mark.

        So yes when initially finding out the RRP of the Essence gZeros I really did think they were 'stupidly expensive' but knowing Rawls experience and trusting what he appreciates in audio playback (the Kdac sound) I bought my head around to giving them a whirl.

        They blow any of my previous SCs out of the water - in a way that I didnt think was possible with cables. But once again a gushing lad who has just unloaded a pack of cash on gear should never be trusted on forums. But everyone around here knows that as we have all been on that particular treadmill. Which is why we are here. We want value and not hifi magazine bullsh!t hype. I've had a gutful of that rubbish and have spent truly stupid money on crap. But since I first spoke to SG on the blower for about 3 hours a few years back and getting to know some handy types around this site, I don't think I've wasted a cent. What I have bought in the way of Kdac, isolation, transport, transport mods, transport zen clock and now a very very fine set of SCs have all helped me inch closer and closer to a sound that I can actually listen to with pleasure.

        So I need to do a backflip. A month ago I thought this amount spent on cables to be stupidly and excessively expensive. Now? Well I see my Essence gZero SCs as a separate component that has really helped with the coming together of the sound I have been wanting for some time and quite possibly have helped my big Vaf i93mk2's sound as good as they are going to get. As hedalfa rightly points out the axiom 80s are sitting in a cardboard box in my garage waiting for right time to get some cabinets made which will no doubt take things to another notch and will take these cables to another level as well. Which is a pleasantly scary idea for me to ponder.

        From what Rawl has said in this thread and from my own listening experience these cables are obviously pretty special things. For me they have defiantly been a very good value purchase. I'm not giving them back that's for sure.

        Unfortunately I'll be in Bali during the Canberra GTG. Boo hoo. Maybe I could look at posting them down to you guys for that weekend though. Then you will get to check them out in a couple of different systems.

        cheers all

        Nathan


        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: onthebeach on February 15, 2014, 04:21:35 PM



        Nathan,

        I hope I haven't made you feel uncomfortable or out of place here - sincerest apologies if I have.

        Over the few phone conversations I have had with yourself and your wife I can tell you guys are great people so:

        as Kajak says - enjoy the journey!

        Tez

        Noooo mate not at all. Far from it. You have touched on some really interesting ideas that are more than valid. You havent said anything that could remotely be taken by anyone as rude to make them feel uncomfortable or out of place. Certainly no apology necessary. I'm not the sort of character that gets put out by that sort of stuff anyway but even if I was there is nothing here from you or anyone else for that matter for me to feel put out or uncomfortable.

        But thanks for caring and thanks for those kind words and thanks for the zenclock ...its figgin awesome man. :-*

        Yes enjoy the journey. Too true. Wise words from the west.
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: Tuyen on February 20, 2014, 04:23:56 PM
        How do these compare to flat copper cables like the Lenehan Ribbonteks or the Goetz?
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: stevenvalve on February 20, 2014, 05:21:42 PM
        How do these compare to flat copper cables like the Lenehan Ribbonteks or the Goetz?
        Goetz M1 T2 version is the speaker cable i use, it is much better sounding, but is not the same as sold by parts connection, There is no painted coating and it has a Teflon dielectric in the middle. The only place i know to get it is the USA distributer, pacific magnetics. But fullrange drivers need a cable that supports there weaknesses so this cable is the one. Most other cables don't sound right, but I would like to try Nathans speaker cable, the balance could be right.  
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: Tuyen on February 20, 2014, 05:58:40 PM
        Cool thanks Steven.  Do you prefer to using speaker terminals (spades or bullets?)  or do you prefer to chopping the terminals off and using the bare flat copper connected to the speaker and amp terminals?

        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: stevenvalve on February 20, 2014, 09:15:08 PM
        Cool thanks Steven.  Do you prefer to using speaker terminals (spades or bullets?)  or do you prefer to chopping the terminals off and using the bare flat copper connected to the speaker and amp terminals?


        Less is nearly always more, So bare flat shiny clean copper connected to the speaker and amp terminals
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: rawl99 on February 21, 2014, 10:24:58 PM
        How do these compare to flat copper cables like the Lenehan Ribbonteks or the Goetz?

        Tuyen,

        I built ribbon cables before Mike brought out his ribbonteks and also have goertz.
        On my system:
        Wadia. I2S...Kdac......VAC phi 200 significantly upgraded.....ML3 references,

         the cables that Nathan has utterly annihilated any of the ribbon versions including goertz.
        The goertz on these "normal" speakers is, relatively speaking, quite dark and closed-in.
        The ribbon may have aome good attributes (dunno what) but it has little nuance and 'life'.

        Nathans speaker cables are ahead in every parameter I could focus on:
        Soundstage width, depth (particularly layering) and sense of height.
        Engagement and sense of life and realness
        Resolution,
        Attack ( essential to create that sense of life in music)
        Decay ( ditto)
        Micro resolution ( ditto)
        And the one that really surprised me was low bass is subjectively better.
        Surprised because Nathan's cables are smaller gauge than the goertz for example, and yet the goertz did not perform as well in the bass.
        I get down below 20hz in-room so the bass extension I have is pretty good.

        As Steve pointed out the darker character of the goertz pairs well with the rising response of a driver such as axiom 80 but I find not so with a flatter measuring type of more modern Box speaker.

        Does that help clarify??

        Craig

        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: rawl99 on February 21, 2014, 10:26:14 PM
        Cool thanks Steven.  Do you prefer to using speaker terminals (spades or bullets?)  or do you prefer to chopping the terminals off and using the bare flat copper connected to the speaker and amp terminals?


        Less is nearly always more, So bare flat shiny clean copper connected to the speaker and amp terminals

        I gotta agree with you here Steve
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: Tuyen on February 21, 2014, 11:00:57 PM
        Definitely does Craig.  Thanks!

        Will be sure to go have a listen to them when Mario gets a pair :)
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: vitavoxdude on February 22, 2014, 05:39:58 PM
         ;D ;D ;D Well I think the plug for these speaker cables has us all interested but exactly how much are they again?
        V
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: rawl99 on February 23, 2014, 08:08:15 AM
        ;D ;D ;D Well I think the plug for these speaker cables has us all interested but exactly how much are they again?
        V

        V,

        Depends on the model chosen I guess which will depend on the relative value perceived in a system.

        Don't know detailed pricing so cannot comment in detail.

        I will endeavour to bring mine down to Andy's in Canberra in April so folks can have a listen and make their own judgement.

        C
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: vitavoxdude on February 23, 2014, 01:26:29 PM
        Is this going to be like comparing a Bugatti Veyron with a Mini Cooper?  Whilst one is ultimately a lot more capable speed wise, one produces grin inducing pleasure at a price most can afford and the other.......................................................
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: onthebeach on February 23, 2014, 03:11:04 PM
        Is this going to be like comparing a Bugatti Veyron with a Mini Cooper?  Whilst one is ultimately a lot more capable speed wise, one produces grin inducing pleasure at a price most can afford and the other.......................................................

        Hopefully there will be some price comparible SCs to compare them with. Its a bummer I cant make it that weekend.
        Title: Re: Essence gZero
        Post by: onthebeach on March 17, 2014, 02:43:31 PM
        http://kleinnovations.com/ (http://kleinnovations.com/)